Free Speech - Forums Group - the Free Speech Platform

Go to content
Free Speech
Free Speech - What are the limits on the Forums.Group platform
One of the most important aspects of an online forum is free speech. With growing censorship on the major social media platforms, we are seeing people's opinions being censored, people banned for their political opinions, certain topics that cannot be discussed and other worrying developments in social media. That is one of the reasons we want to strongly permit free-speech on this platform, which is based on the laws of Germany that permits free speech in its basic laws (constitution). We allow free speech where it is allowed under German law. We do not censor people for their political opinions, provided they are not breaking any laws. However, there are limits and this page is designed to explain the laws and limits applied in Germany and therefore on the forums.group platform. If in doubt, please see the original sources as what is published here is meant as a guide and should not be deemed as legal advice.
If someone does write something on our platform and a complaint is made that legally requires its removal, the moderator or author of the post cannot be heald liable if the content is removed quickly (not defined exactly, but within 24 hours is generally OK) after being informed.


Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany
Article 5
[Freedom of expression, arts and sciences]
(1) Every person shall have the right freely to express and disseminate his opinions in speech, writing and pictures and to inform himself without hindrance from generally accessible sources. Freedom of the press and freedom of reporting by means of broadcasts and films shall be guaranteed. There shall be no censorship.
(2) These rights shall find their limits in the provisions of general laws, in provisions for the protection of young persons and in the right to personal honour.
(3) Arts and sciences, research and teaching shall be free. The freedom of teaching shall not release any person from allegiance to the constitution.

Censorship in the Federal Republic of Germany

The Federal Republic of Germany guarantees freedom of speech, expression, and opinion to its citizens as per Article 5 of the constitution. Despite this, censorship of various materials has taken place since the Allied occupation after World War II and continues to take place in Germany in various forms due to a limiting provision in Article 5, Paragraph 2 of the constitution. In 2014 the Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Index ranked Germany as 14th (out of 180 countries) in the world in terms of press freedom.[1] During the Allied occupation of Germany, the media was controlled by the occupying forces. The policy rationales differed among the occupying powers, but there was resentment in literary and journalistic circles in many parts of the country. Undesired publishing efforts were unilaterally blocked by the occupying forces.

Since the publication of the German Grundgesetz, there have been two kinds of censored media in Germany. The first is material that is considered offensive or indecent; such media are placed on the "Index" and restricted in their publication, and distribution to minors is illegal. The second is material that is considered anti-constitutional, dangerous to the state. The underlying concept is "streitbare Demokratie" (self-defending democracy) that legally hinders the rise of all anti-constitutional and thus undemocratic movements. The media concerned are banned outright, with criminal penalties for infringements. An example is the outright ban on material which supports National Socialism.

Main laws
The most important and sometimes controversial regulations limiting freedom of speech and freedom of the press can be found in the Criminal code:
  • Insult is punishable under Section 185. Satire and similar forms of art enjoy more freedom but have to respect human dignity (Article 1 of the Basic law).
  • Malicious Gossip and Defamation (Section 186 and 187). Utterances about facts (opposed to personal judgement) are allowed if they are true and can be proven. Yet journalists are free to investigate without evidence because they are justified by Safeguarding Legitimate Interests (Section 193).
  • Hate speech or "incitement of popular hatred" (Volksverhetzung) may be punishable if against segments of the population and in a manner that is capable of disturbing the public peace (Section 130 Agitation of the People), including racist agitation and antisemitism.
  • Holocaust denial is punishable according to Section 130 subsection 3.
  • Dissemination of means of propaganda of unconstitutional organizations (Section 86).
  • Use of symbols of unconstitutional organizations (Section 86a) as the Swastika.
  • Disparagement of
  • Insult to organs and representatives of foreign states (Section 103).
  • Rewarding and approving crimes (Section 140).
  • Casting false suspicion (Section 164).
  • Blasphemy in the sense of Insulting of faiths, religious societies and organizations dedicated to a philosophy of life if they could disturb public peace (Section 166)
  • Dissemination of pornographic writings (Section 184).
  • Dissemination of writings depicting cruel or otherwise inhumane acts of violence in a manner that is trivializing, glorifying or otherwise injuring human dignity (Section 131).

Outdoor assemblies need no permit, but (generally) prior announcement to authorities.[8] Assemblies can be banned, on a case-by-case basis, at memorial sites or if they endanger public security or order.[9] The right can be ruled forfeit[10] if used to combat the liberal democratic order; parties and other organisations that are banned do not enjoy it.[9] The Love Parade decision (1 BvQ 28/01 and 1 BvQ 30/01 of 12 July 2001) determined that for an assembly to be protected it must comply with the concept of a constituent assembly, or the so-called narrow concept of assembly whereby the participants in the assembly must pursue a common purpose that is in the common interest.[11]

Index of Harmful Materials
Provision 2 of Article 5 of the Basic Law enabled the creation of the Bundesprüfstelle für jugendgefährdende Medien, or the Federal Examination Department for Media Harmful to Young Persons. The Department is responsible for maintaining the Index of Harmful Materials. Materials on the Index are severely restricted in their sale and distribution: they cannot be sold by mail, and many materials can only be sold "under the counter". While their advertisement and marketing is censored in general, these publications themselves are not.
Items on the index include pornography, graphic media which glorify war and violence, materials considered to be anti-constitutional (such as the writings of the Red Army Faction), and material likely or intended to induce hate.[12]
This has resulted in Germany being known for unnecessary censorship of video games and animation. In games like Soldier of Fortune, Half-Life, Team Fortress and Turok: Dinosaur Hunter characters were turned into robots while in Command and Conquer: Generals the portraits of the Generals which are photos of real actors were turned into robots and a suicide bombing unit was turned into a bomb on wheels. While others such as Grand Theft Auto has removed bleeding and removed other gameplay modes.[13][14]
Material that is considered unconstitutional is also dealt with by the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution) and may be brought to trial in court. The Verfassungsschutz often operates via "V-Männer" (colloq. shorthand for "Verbindungsmänner", lit. "connection men" - recruited members of unconstitutional groupings working under cover for the state) who keep track of and counter unconstitutional political movements and their projects. This concept of "streitbare Demokratie" (self-defending democracy) was developed as a late response especially to the rise of the NSDAP, but also KPD, that turned the democratic Weimar Republic into the Nazi regime.

Anti-constitutional activity
German protections for freedom of ideas and expression are superseded by various provisions against "anti-constitutional" (verfassungsfeindlich) politics. In practice the ban on "anti-constitutional" politics targets two main categories, Nazism (including Neo-Nazism) and Communism. In the Annual Report on the Protection of the Constitution these categories are discussed in the main chapters on right-wing extremism and left-wing extremism, respectively. Additionally scientology and some other groups are included as "anti-constitutional."[15]

Communism
During the Cold War the main emphasis in the Federal Republic of Germany's struggle against "anti-constitutional" activities was placed on communist subversion; most importantly it led to the 1956 ban of the Communist Party of Germany as anti-constitutional, and the ban or surveillance of several other communist or far-left organizations.[16] A number of far-left organizations and their publications are monitored by the Federal Office for Protection of the Constitution as "anti-constitutional."[15] Furthermore the flag and other symbols of the German Democratic Republic with hammer and sickle were banned as anti-constitutional; in the Federal Republic of Germany the GDR flag was regarded as a secessionist flag.[17]

National Socialism and Holocaust denial
National Socialist parties
National Socialism is banned outright in Germany as anti-constitutional; it is illegal to found or belong to a Nazi party. Any party considered to be National Socialist can be banned by the Bundesverfassungsgericht, Germany's highest court. Likewise, publications in support of such groups are automatically placed on the Index, and some may be banned altogether.[18]

Materials which express sympathy with National Socialism, however, are a more complicated manner. Ordinarily the printing of these materials does not constitute membership of a National Socialist organization and is therefore allowed. These materials are almost always placed on the Index.

Criminal law also proscribes symbols that are strongly identified with the Nazi Party (such as the Swastika) or that are symbols used often by neo-Nazi successor organizations or racist organizations in general.

There is a debate about whether the German NPD is National Socialist and there have been attempts to ban it.

Mein Kampf
Printing and public distribution of Hitler's book Mein Kampf was not allowed by the copyright holder, the state of Bavaria, which acquired the copyright after Hitler's death in 1945 since it was the location of his official residence. The copyright expired at the end of 2015.[19] Private ownership and trade is allowed so long as it does not "promote hatred or war". The lesser-known "Second Book" is legal to print and trade, but it appears on the Index.

Holocaust denial
Holocaust denial is a crime in Germany. § 130(3) of the StGB (German penal code) reads:

He who, publicly or in assembly, approves, denies, or trivializes genocide committed under the regime of National Socialism in a way that is suitable to disturb the public peace, is subject to imprisonment up to 5 years or a monetary fine.[20]

Perpetrators of Holocaust denial can be tried in absentia and declared persona non grata, thus being barred from entering the country. Extradition treaties as relate to Holocaust denial are subject to political asylum pleas, but a persona non grata who enters Germany can be immediately arrested. Furthermore, a German arrest warrant based on the offense of Holocaust denial is deemed executable in many EU states, thus, a Holocaust denier's entry into any EU state could lead to arrest and extradition to Germany (or any other state where such denial is an offense, such as Austria, and which has issued an arrest warrant).

Among those who have been charged with Holocaust denial in Germany are the following:

  • David Irving, who was declared persona non grata and has not returned to Germany;
  • Germar Rudolf, who was sentenced to prison but fled jurisdiction; he was deported from the United States in 2005;
  • Ernst Zündel, received a five-year prison sentence on February 15, 2007 in Germany,
  • Frederick Toben, an Australian citizen, who had an appointment with a German public prosecutor in Mannheim with whom he wanted to discuss Holocaust denial; at the end of the conversation with the prosecutor, Toben was presented an arrest warrant which the prosecutor had already obtained beforehand. A German court sentenced him to a prison sentence of ten months.

Scientology and other categories
Scientology is regarded as anti-constitutional by German authorities.[15]

References
  1. Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Index Archived February 14, 2014, at the Wayback Machine 2014
  2. Read No Evil Time magazine, May 27, 1946
  3. Note: In August 1946 the order was amended so that "In the interest of research and scholarship, the Zone Commanders (in Berlin the Komendatura) may preserve a limited number of documents prohibited in paragraph 1. These documents will be kept in special accommodation where they may be used by German scholars and other German persons who have received permission to do so from the Allies only under strict supervision by the Allied Control Authority
  4. Theodore Ziolkowski (1981-05-17). "Historical Analogy". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-11-04.
  5. Doris Betzl (2003-04-03). "Geburt als Skorpion, Tod als Papiertiger". Rezensionsforum Literaturkritik, No. 4 (in German). Literaturkritik DE. Retrieved 2007-11-01.
  6. Did the United States Create Democracy in Germany? the Independent Institute
  7. German Law Archive
  8. FRA 2008, p. 24
  9. a b FRA 2008, p. 23
  10. Article 18 Basic Law
  11. "Legal Study on Homophobia and Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation – Germany" (PDF). European Union Fundamental Rights Agency. February 2008: 23.
  12. "Information in English". Bundesprüfstelle für jugendgefährdende Medien. Archived from the original on 2009-07-13. Retrieved 2007-11-04.
  13. Cooper, Tristan. "5 Weird Ways Germany Has Censored Video Games". Dorkly. Retrieved 2017-07-09.
  14. "Germany has a strange history of video game censorship". 2017-01-11. Retrieved 2017-07-09.
  15. a b c Verfassungsschutz­bericht 2018, Federal Office for Protection of the Constitution
  16. Patrick Major, The Death of the KPD: Communism and Anti-Communism in West Germany, 1945–1956, Clarendon Press, 1998, ISBN 9780191583902
  17. Werner Kilian: Das Fünfmarkgroße Spalteremblem. Der Sport und das Deutschlandproblem. In Die Hallstein-Doktrin, Berlin 2001, pp. 251–274
  18. "German Penal Code (section 86)". Strafgesetzbuch. Retrieved 2007-11-04.
  19. Dermot McEvoy. "Is It Time To Republish Mein Kampf in Germany?". Publishers Weekly. Archived from the original on 2008-02-19. Retrieved 2007-11-04.
  20. "German Penal Code (section 130)". Strafgesetzbuch. Retrieved 2007-11-04.
© 2020, Peter Walker Systems. All rights reserved. All other product names and any registered and unregistered trademarks mentioned are used for identification purposes only and remain the exclusive property of their respective owners. This site is not affiliated with Yahoo or groups.io in any way.

Back to content